Volume 26, Issue 100 (4-2026)
refahj 2026, 26(100): 0-0 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Hamidi soha Z, vesali S S, Janadleh A, Alizad E. (2026). Institutional Inconsistencies in Women's Welfare Policymaking: An Analysis of Obstacles in the Policy System Against NGOs' Participatio. refahj. 26(100), : 6 doi:10.32598/refahj.26.100.2
URL: http://refahj.uswr.ac.ir/article-1-4468-en.html
URL: http://refahj.uswr.ac.ir/article-1-4468-en.html
Abstract: (740 Views)
Introduction: Despite the official discourse emphasizing its importance, the participation of Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) in women’s welfare policymaking in Iran remains largely ineffective and limited. This situation, which can be termed the “institutional silence” of NGOs, stems from internal dysfunctions within the policymaking system that hinder their effective role.
Method: This qualitative study employed thematic analysis. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 15 individuals, including civil activists, policymakers, women’s studies scholars, and NGO managers, conducted between August 2023 and May 2024. The data were analyzed using Elinor Ostrom’s institutional analysis framework. It should be noted that the thematic analysis was conducted inductively without any theoretical presuppositions, and Ostrom’s framework was used solely to explain the relationships among the themes and to provide an institutional analysis of the barriers.
Findings: The analysis revealed seven main themes: “Informational dysfunctions,” “Attitudinal and approach dualities,” “Ethical vacuum in the power sphere,” “Managerial incompetence,” “Token participation,” “Financial corruption,” and “Promise-action gap.” These themes form a complex network of multilayered barriers that effectively impede NGO participation.
Discussion: The extracted themes uncovered a set of hidden, obstructive patterns within the policymaking system that operate as a vicious cycle. Breaking this cycle necessitates institutional redesign, strengthening transparency and accountability mechanisms, and a fundamental revision of the approaches governing women’s welfare policymaking.
Method: This qualitative study employed thematic analysis. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 15 individuals, including civil activists, policymakers, women’s studies scholars, and NGO managers, conducted between August 2023 and May 2024. The data were analyzed using Elinor Ostrom’s institutional analysis framework. It should be noted that the thematic analysis was conducted inductively without any theoretical presuppositions, and Ostrom’s framework was used solely to explain the relationships among the themes and to provide an institutional analysis of the barriers.
Findings: The analysis revealed seven main themes: “Informational dysfunctions,” “Attitudinal and approach dualities,” “Ethical vacuum in the power sphere,” “Managerial incompetence,” “Token participation,” “Financial corruption,” and “Promise-action gap.” These themes form a complex network of multilayered barriers that effectively impede NGO participation.
Discussion: The extracted themes uncovered a set of hidden, obstructive patterns within the policymaking system that operate as a vicious cycle. Breaking this cycle necessitates institutional redesign, strengthening transparency and accountability mechanisms, and a fundamental revision of the approaches governing women’s welfare policymaking.
Article number: 6
Keywords: : Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs), welfare policymaking, women, social participation, institutional dysfunction.
Type of Study: orginal |
Received: 2025/05/3 | Accepted: 2026/02/9 | Published: 2026/05/31
Received: 2025/05/3 | Accepted: 2026/02/9 | Published: 2026/05/31
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
Contact Information
Copyright © The Author(s);
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-By-NC 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
Contact Information
