چکیده: (11581 مشاهده)
The main questions of paper are what are indicators of social development?
What is the weight of each of the selected social development indices with
weights valuation (entropy), based on 2007 data in Iran? How is rating of social
development indicators based on the weight of them in Iran's provinces and
what is the relationship between the scores of social capital and social
development situation in the provinces? This article is based on theories and
indicators of social development and issues raised in Copenhagen, in the field of
social development, and other theories in relation to social capital and
development. Methods of paper is based on secondary analysis of information
and provincial data for 30 provinces with using deciding multiple indicators
method in provincial ranking and statistics related to the correlation in the
relationship between variables. The findings indicate that thirteen indicators are
useful for understanding social development status and based on this index, the
Yazd province has maximum and kohgiloyeh province has minimum level of
social development. Finally, the ranking obtained from the provinces, the
correlation of the social capital of provinces with social development, has been
measured. The results show, between social development and some elements of
social capital include: individual trust and generalized trust, exists a significant
inverse relationship. Similarly, between social development and the other
elements of social capital include: network relationships within the group, formal
participation, informal participation and institutional trust, there is no significant
relationship.
نوع مطالعه:
اصیل |
موضوع مقاله:
رفاه اجتماعی دریافت: 1390/1/20 | انتشار: 1389/4/24