Volume 17, Issue 64 (4-2017)                   refahj 2017, 17(64): 39-72 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Abbasian E, Moftakhari A, Nademi Y. (2017). The Nonlinear Effects of Oil Revenues on Social Welfare in Iran. refahj. 17(64), 39-72.
URL: http://refahj.uswr.ac.ir/article-1-2864-en.html
Abstract:   (6107 Views)
Introduction: Study of the effect of oil revenues on social welfare  is one of the most important subjects for economic policy makers in oil-rich countries. Despite Iran's massive supply of natural gas and oil, poverty and unemployment have been critical issues in recent years for the majority of people. .  In Iran, oil almost provides a significant percentage of government revenues independently from the other economic sectors. In economic studies, different nonlinear methods have been applied to examine the relationship between oil shocks and social welfare in both importing and exporting countries . This study focuses on the nonlinear effect of oil revenues on social welfare in Iran during the 1975-2014 periods.
 .
Method: In this research, by modeling the effective factors on social welfare with emphasis on the role of oil revenues, a threshold regression model is estimated for Iran’s economy. Several classes of nonlinear autoregressive models were formulated for time series applications based on  threshold models. In mathematical or statistical modelling, a threshold model is any model where a threshold value, or set of threshold values, is used to distinguish ranges of values where the predicted behaviour  by the model varies in some important way.
Findings: The share of oil revenues in GDP has a nonlinear and threshold impact on social welfare. In other words, in low oil revenues regime- (when the share of oil revenues in GDP is lower than 9.35%) - increase in the share of oil revenues in GDP has led to a significant increase in  social welfare,  however, after exceeding the threshold of 9.35% and being in the high oil revenues regime, an increase in the ratio of oil revenues to gross domestic product had a negative impact on the social welfare index.
Discussion: In low oil revenues regime, the positive effect of oil revenues on social welfare is  due to the expansion of the oil industry and workforce transition from the traditional to the oil sector which lead to improvement in income level and income inequality reduction. Also, oil revenues in the early stages of entering the state budget are largely devoted to government’s development programs and infrastructure and development expenditures which are effective in improving growth and social welfare.
 In addition, the entry of oil revenues, import of goods and services and urbanization all have effects on improving social welfare. However,  with the increase in the share of oil revenue in GDP, the government rent seeking behavior by popular and anti-development current expenditures, crowding out effect, inefficient civil projects, non-targeted subsidies  and strengthen the activities of rent-seeking will reduce social welfare.
Full-Text [PDF 508 kb]   (7038 Downloads)    
Type of Study: orginal |
Received: 2017/07/29 | Accepted: 2017/07/29 | Published: 2017/07/29

References
1. Aizenman, J. & Marion, N. (1999). Volatility and Inves‌tment: Interpreting Evidence from Developing Countries. Economica, 66, 157-79.
2. Aizenman, J. & Marion, N. (1999). Volatility and Inves‌tment: Interpreting Evidence from Developing Countries. Economica, 66, 157-79.
3. Alotaibi, B. (2006). Oil price fluctuations and the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries, 1960-2004. Unpublished dissertation, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale.
4. Carneiro, F. G. (2007). Development Challenges of Resource-Rich Countries: The Case of Oil Exporters. VI International Colloquium, Macrodynamic Capabilities and Economic Development, University of Brasilia. Brasilia, Brazil. pp.115-140.
5. Collier, P. & Goderis, B. (2007). Commodity prices and growth: Reconciling a conundrum. Department of Economics, University of Oxford, available on http://users.ox.ac.uk/econpco/research/pdfs/CommodityPricesAndGrowth. pdf.
6. Darby, M. (1982). The Price of Oil and World Inflation and Recession. American Economic Review, 72, 738-751.
7. Devlin, J. & Lewin, M. (2005). “Managing oil booms and bus‌ts in developing countries” in Managing Economic Volatility and Crises: A Practitioner’s Guide, ed. J. Aizenman and B. Pinto, 186-211, Cambridge, United Kingdom, CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS.
8. Dreger, C. & Rahmani, T. (2016). The impact of oil revenues on the Iranian economy and the Gulf s‌tates. OPEC Energy Review, 40(1), 36-49.
9. Farzanegan, M. R. & Markwardt, G. (2009). The effects of oil price shocks on the Iranian economy. Energy Economics, 31(1), 134-151.
10. Gylfason, P. (1999). Natural resources and economic growth: a nordic perspective on the Dutch disease. United Nations University, World Ins‌titute for Development Economics Research, No. 167.
11. Hansen, B. E. (1996). Inference when a nuisance parameter is not identified under the null hypothesis. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 64(2), 413-430.
12. Hansen, B. E. (2000). Sample splitting and threshold es‌timation. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 68(3), 575-603.
13. Hesham, A. R. & Wang, P. (1997). Social Welfare and income inequality in a sys‌tem of city. Journal of Urban Economic, 41, 462-483.
14. Joshi, V. (1970). ‘Saving and Foreign Exchange Cons‌traints’, in P. P. S‌treeten (ed.), Unfashionable Economics: Essays in Honour of Lord Balogh ( London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1970 ). 111-133.
15. Lajous, A. (2014). The Impact of Lower Oil Prices on the Mexican Economy. Available on: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/5d47/55730da1abe9080c47d4656eb91b6861f3db.pdf.
16. Lewis, W. A. (1980). The slowing down of the engine of growth. The American Economic Review, 70(4), 555-564.
17. Meyer, B. D. & Rosenboum, D. T. (2000). Making single mothers work, Recent Tax And Welfare Policy And its Effects. National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper.
18. Mork, K. A., Olsen, O. & Mysen, H. T. (1994). Macroeconomic responses to oil price increases and decreases in seven OECD countries. The Energy Journal, Volume15, issue Number 4, 19-36.
19. Ramey, G. & Ramey, V. A. (1995). Cross-Country Evidence on the Link Between Volatility and Growth. American Economic Review, 85, 1138–51.
20. Sachs J. D. & Warner, A. M. (1995). Natural Resource Abundance and Economic Growth. NBER Working Paper No. 5398, December.
21. Sala-I-Martin, X. & Subramanian, A. (2003). Addressing the Natural Resource Curse: An Illus‌tration From Nigeria. NBER Working Paper No. 9804.
22. Sen, A. (1974). Informational bases of alternative welfare approaches: aggregation and income dis‌tribution. Journal of Public Economics, 3(4), 387-403.
23. Van Wijnbergen, S. (1984). TheDutch Disease’: a disease after all?. The Economic Journal, 94(373), 41-55.

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Social Welfare Quarterly

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb