The growing recognition of the gap between social Justice as an abstraction and injustice as a tact of life emerged in four approaches to social Justice. The work ethic orientation toward social life suggested proportionality view via described two approaches, economic Individualism and equity, while Egalitarianism view include other approaches, equality and Need.

Proportionality appear to represent a sentiment toward rewarding individual contribution to society and withholding benefits to individuals who do not contribute. Egalitarianism appears to represent equal access to basic sevices. Equal treatment of all members of society, and the redistribution of wealth. In this article discussion of different approaches and their relation to social orientation, Achievement motivation, procedural Justice and values among 150 high school teachers in Isfahan indicates meaningful pattern of relation. Discriminate validity of four scale of social justice can be observed by noting the moderately correlations between values and proportionality views (economic individualism and equity) or egalitarianism views (equality and needs). Convergent validity was confirmed by meaningful correlation between proportion ti on ality scale and achievement motivation, Also between egalitarianism scale and procedural justice and social orientation