Volume 16, Issue 60 (6-2016)                   refahj 2016, 16(60): 7-32 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Razaghi R. Adoptive families: Necessity for Research in Social Welfare . refahj. 2016; 16 (60) :7-32
URL: http://refahj.uswr.ac.ir/article-1-2474-en.html
Abstract:   (3124 Views)

Introduction: It is often assumed that after child placement in an adoptive family, the adoptive parents and the adoptees will take an easy and happy passage throughout their life. But in reality they experience several different stresses that can lead to the failure in the adoption process for adoptive parents. This is an unpleasant occurrence for both the adoptive parents and the adoptees, which occasionally instigates the disruption of this relationship and multiple separation experience for the child. With increasing the rate of adoption and adoptive families in Iran (1000 adoptive families per year and more than 30000 adoptive families); the interest in recognition of adoptive families, related challenges and required support and services has grown. Often, Iranian adoptive families consider adoption as a mystery and most of them try to hide the case of adoption.

In Iran the unknown factors about adoption are more than the countries that have done vast studies on this issue. The aim of this study was to investigate the challenges associated with the Iranian adoptive families and research needs in this area.

Methods: In this systematic review study, the English databases (google scholar, Elsevier, and PubMed) and Persian databases (SID, Magiran, and IranDoc) have been searched to find out relevant articles on adoption especially in Iran. Furthermore, State Welfare Organization of Iran publications added to this search. The most of searches were limited to ten years (2000-2010) nearly.

Findings: Although recent research indicates more stability and continuity in adoptions in Iran, we must acknowledge that adoptive families and adoptees are still facing huge challenges. Most of the articles published on adoption in Iran were related to legal studies and comparative studies of juridical and legal issues. There are few studies on social and psychological factors of selecting adoption process among infertile couples, the obstacles on adoption and also the educational needs of the applicants for adoption. Some studies showed the following themes as important characteristics of adoption in Iran: infertility of couples, gender of adoptee, Mahramiyat (confidentiality or familial privacy as a religious and cultural subject), understanding the child history, telling the fact to the adopted child and post-adoption challenges. The other important issue is factors result in failure to adoption which are classified in three categories: (1) Child characteristics, (2) Parents and adoptive family characteristics, and (3) Welfare characteristics. The follow-up studies on child adoption process were limited in Iranian families. In the absence of evidence based statistics and information, there are no study about adoptive families and adoptees after adoption finalization too.

Discussion: Although a thematic classification on important issues of adoption has done in Iran, most of the studies are limited to legal issues and few researches have studied effective factors on adoption by infertile couples. The lack of post-adoption studies is another important issue that might be effective in planning and policy making in this area. There are some questions for researches that could answer the needs of adoptive families. The consequences that the adoptees endure because of adoption failure must direct the researchers, psychologists and politicians to work on various fronts and study more about it. They have to make more studies to prevent possible failure in adoption, decrease its consequences and negative impacts on families, and also provide positive intervention to promote adoption and improve the welfare of the adoptive families and adoptees. The adoptive families are growing each year in Iran, and its subsequent needs and demands are wide and diverse. Research findings support the claim that meeting the needs of families and children at different stages of decision-making for adoption and parenting requires scientific planning and professional support. The families also need to have access to pre and post adoption interventions during all stages of adoption and fostering. The main problem of these families and the effective factors on success, maintenance or failure of adoption should be examined systematically, otherwise the effect of these services could be faced with ambiguity. Overall, the well-being of these families requires further analytic research and systematic orientation by considering cultural factors

Full-Text [PDF 529 kb]   (2196 Downloads)    
Type of Study: orginal |
Received: 2016/06/5 | Accepted: 2016/06/5 | Published: 2016/06/5

1. Barth, R. P., and Miller, J. (2000). Post-adoption services: What are the empirical foundations? Family Relations, 49, 447–455.
2. Barth, R. P., Gibbs, D. A., &Siebenaler, K. (2001).Assessing the field of post-adoption service: Family needs, program models, and evaluation issues. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
3. Berry, M., & Barth, R. P. (1990).A study of disrupted adoptive placements of adolescents.Child Welfare, 69(3), 209–225.
4. Bokaie.M, Farajkhoda.T, Enjezab.B, Heidari.P, Karimi Zarchi.M(2012)Barriers of child adoption in infertile couples: Iranian’s views. Iran J Reprod Med Vol.10. No.5. 429-434,
5. Brodzinsky DM,SchechterMD,eds (1990). The Psychology of Adoption. New York: Oxford University Press .
6. Brodzinsky, D.M. (1993). Long-term outcome in adoption.The Future of Children, 3, 153-166.
7. Brodzinsky,D (2013) A Need to Know:Enhancing Adoption Competence among Mental Health Professinals. The Donaldson Adoption Institute: http://aap.uchc.edu/documents/2013_08_ANeedToKnow.pdf.
8. Burrell Cowan, A. (2004). New strategies to promote the adoption of older children out of foster care.Children and Youth Services Review, 26, 1007-1020.
9. Coackly, J and Berrick, J (2008) Research Review: In a rush to permanency: preventing adoption disruption. Child & Family Social Work. (13) 101-112.
10. Coakley, J. (2005). Finalized adoption disruption: A family perspective. Doctoral dissertation, University of California,Berkeley.
11. Evan B. Donaldson Adoption Institute. (2004). What’s working for children: A policy study of adoption stability and termination. Retrieved November 15, 2004, from www.adoptioninstitute.org/publications/Disruption_Report.pdf.
12. Festinger, T. (1990). Adoption disruption: Rates and correlates. In D. M. Brodzinsky & M. D. Schechter (Eds.), The psychology of adoption (pp. 201–218). New York: Oxford University Press.
13. Festinger, T. (2002). After adoption: Dissolution or permanence? Child Welfare, 81(3), 515–533.
14. Fisher, P. A., Kim, H. K., & Pears, K. C. (2009).Effects of Multidimensional Treatment Foster Care for Preschoolers (MTFC-)) on reducing permanent placement failures among children with placement instability.Children and Youth Services Review, 31, 541-546
15. Foli, K.J., South, S.C., & Lim, E. (2014). Maternal postadoption depression: Theory refinement through qualitative content analysis. Journal of Research in Nursing, 19(4), 303-327.
16. Groza, V., and Rosenberg, K. F. (Eds.).(2nd Ed.). (2001). Clinical and practical issues in adoption: Bridging the gap between adoptees placed as infants and as older children. Westport, CT: Praeger.
17. Hegar, R. (2005). Sibling placement in foster care and adoption: an overview ofinternational research. Child and Youth Services Review, 27, 717-734.
18. Houston, D. M., & Kramer, L. A. (2008).Meeting the long-term needs of families who adopt children out of foster care: A three year follow-up study.Child Welfare,87,145-170
19. Janus,N,G (1997) Adoption Counseling as a Professional Specialty Area for Counselors. Journal of Counseling and development. 75. 266-274.
20. Juffer, F., & van IJzendoorn, M.H. (2005). Behavior problems and mental health referrals of international adoptees.Journal of the American Medical Association, 293, 2501–2515.
21. Juffer, F., & van IJzendoorn, M.H. (2007). Adoptees do not lack self-esteem: A meta-analysis of studies on self-esteem of transracial,international, and domestic adoptees. Psychological Bulletin, 133,1067–1083.
22. McDonald, T. P., Propp, J. R., & Murphy, K. C. (2001). Thepostadoption experience: Child, parent, and family predictorsof family adjustment to adoption. Child Welfare, 80(1),71-94.
23. Mott, S.L., Schiller, C.E., Richards, J.G., O’Hara, M.W., & Stuart, S. (2011). Depression and anxiety among postpartum and adoptive mothers. Achieves of Women’s Mental Health, 14(4), 335-343.
24. Nalavany, B. A., Ryan, S. D., Howard, J. A., & Smith, S. L. (2008).Preadoptive child sexual abuse as a predictor of moves in care, adoption disruptions, and inconsistent adoptive parent commitment. Child Abuse & Neglect, 32, 1084–1088.
25. Pace, C, S (2014) Assessing attachment representations among adoptees during middle childhood and adolescence with the Friend and Family Interview (FFI): clinical and research perspectives.Frontiers in Psychology | Psychology for Clinical Settings. (5) 1114, 1-4.: www.frontiersin.org
26. Palacios, J. & Brodzinsky, D. (2010). Adoption research: Trends, topics, and outcomes. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 34, 270-284.
27. Palacios, J. (2009). The ecology of adoption. In G.M. Wrobel& E. Neil (Eds.), International advances in adoption research for practice (pp. 71–94). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
28. Reilly, T., &Platz, L. (2004). Post-adoption service needs of families with special needs children: Use,helpfulness, and unmet needs. Journal of Social Service Research, 30 (4), 51- 67.
29. Rosenthal, J. A., Schmidt, D., & Conner, J. (1988). Predictorsof special needs adoption disruption: An exploratory study.Children and Youth Services Review, 10, 101–117.
30. Rycus, J., Freundlich, M., Hughes, R., Keefer, B., & Oakes, E. (2006).Confronting barriers to adoption success. Family Court Review, 44(2), 210-230
31. Salzer,L (2006) Adoption after Infertility in: Infertility Counseling. Edited by Covington, S and Hammer Burns.Cambridge University Press.
32. Schweiger, Wendi K. and Marion O'Brien. 2005. “Special Needs Adoption: An Ecological Systems Approach.” Family Relations 54(4):512–522.
33. Senecky, Y., Agassi, H., Inbar, D., Horesh, N., Diamond, G., Bergman, Y.S., Apter, A.(2009). Post-adoption depression among adoptive mothers. Journal of Affective Disorders, 115 (1-2),62-68.
34. Shapiro V, Shapiro J, Paret I. (2003) Complex Adoption & Assisted Reproductive Technology: A Developmental Approach to Clinical Practice.American Journal of Orthopsychiatry (73)117
35. Shapiro V, Shapiro J, Paret I. (2001)Complex Adoption and Assisted Reproductive Technologies. New York: Guilford Press.
36. Smith, S. L., Howard, J. A., Garnier, P. C., & Ryan, S. D. (2006).Where are we now? A post-ASFA examination of disruption. Adoption Quarterly, 9(4), 19–44.
37. Snowden, J., Leon, S., &Sieracki, J. (2008). Predictors of children in foster care beingadopted: A classification tree analysis. Children and Youth Services Review, 30,1318-1327.
38. Wegar, K. (2000). Adoption, family ideology, and social stigma: bias incommunity attitudes, adoption research, and practice. Family Relations, 49, 363–370.
39. Westhues. A., 8 Cohen, J.S. (1990). Healthy functioning families for adoptive and foster children. University of Toronto Press: Toronto.
40. Winokur M, Holtan A, Valentine D. (2009) Kinship care for the safety, permanency, and well-being of children removed from the home for maltreatment. Campbell Systematic Reviews.
41. Yassini.S.M, Taghavi Shavazi.M, Taghavi Shavazi.N (2012) Factors associated with adoption acceptance rate from the view point of infertile couples. Iran J Reprod Med Vol.10. No.5. 413-418.

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:

© 2020 All Rights Reserved | Social Welfare Quarterly

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb