Volume 16, Issue 63 (3-2017)                   refahj 2017, 16(63): 127-157 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Heidari Sareban V, Yari Hesar A, Saeb S. A Study on Effects of Tourism on Promoting the Social Welfare Indices (Case Study: Onar and Kojang Villages, Meshkinshar County) . refahj. 2017; 16 (63) :127-157
URL: http://refahj.uswr.ac.ir/article-1-2719-en.html
Abstract:   (6837 Views)

Social welfare is the most important part of the concept of sustainable development which provides the possibility of meeting the needs of today's generation without destroying the ability of future generations to meet their needs. Rural social welfare includes an organized series of laws, regulations and policies, which are presented in the form of welfare and social institutions in order to meet the spiritual and material needs of people and to provide human felicity. The development literature suggests that promotion of rural social welfare indices is a function of various factors such as tourism activities. Development and prosperity of rural tourism as an efficient catalyst for the reproduction and the promotion of social welfare in rural areas should be highlighted. Accordingly, this study aimed to investigate the effects of tourism on the promotion of social welfare indices in rural areas of the Meshginshahr county.

Method: This study was conducted through a survey method using simple random sampling among 331 residents of Onar village, a touristy village. On the one hand, in order to have an equal test and result, using causal-comparative, 331 residents of Kojang village a non-touristy village were selected through causal-comparative method as the control group. The validity of the questionnaire was confirmed by a panel of experts. A pre-test was carried out with 30 questionnaires and by using Cronbach's alpha coefficient the reliability of the study was 0/79.

Findings: With regard to the characteristics of indicators of social welfare of two groups, tourism development had an impact on all indicators of social welfare, except for membership in civic organizations. In other words, statistical analysis showed that development in tourism had an effect on the promotion of social welfare indicators in rural areas of Meshginshahr, as the correlation between  tourism development and all components of the promotion of social welfare indicators except for the membership in civic organizations hypothesis was proved. In this regard, the calculated P for tourism development with leisure components, access to education, access to health services, personal well-being, diversity, social participation, social capital and housing situation was less than 0/01.

Discussion: Tourism plays an important role in the promotion of social welfare indices in terms of improved housing, personal well-being, strengthening social capital, strengthening the participation of rural residents as stakeholders in rural development projects and strengthening social sustainability, creating social connections, improving productivity due to increased awareness and reducing conflicts collective and strengthening the education and health infrastructure in rural areas. Finally, in order to develop rural tourism due to its positive effects on the promotion of social welfare indices in rural areas of Meshginshahr, tourism infrastructures such as water supply, electricity, waste disposal, sewage and telecommunications have to be properly developed in this city.

Also, protecting and preserving the environment, efficient and balanced use of natural resources and rural assets should be taken into account and any interference with the structure of the village for rural tourism planning should be carried out alongside increasing the  awareness of villagers, participation rural and the involvement of the villagers in the process of rural tourism as the main beneficiaries of the project. There should be a financial support for the development of rural tourism in rural areas of Meshginshahr. The results of this study showed that tourism development had an impact on in the promotion of social welfare indices in rural areas of Meshginshahr.

Full-Text [PDF 532 kb]   (4098 Downloads)    
Type of Study: orginal |
Received: 2017/03/13 | Accepted: 2017/03/13 | Published: 2017/03/13

1. Beaumont, R. & Soforonoff, K. (2013). Multi-model intervention for social skills training in s‌tudent with high- functioning ASD: the Secret Agent Society.
2. Belisele, F. & Hoy, D. (2008). The perceived impact of tourism by resident, case s‌tudy in Santia Marate. Annals Tourism Reserch, 71, 12-17.
3. Benedek, J. & Deszi, S. (2008). The role of rural tourism in the economic diversification of rural space in Romania. International Conference, 25, 230-233.
4. Briedenhann, J. &Wickens, E. (2008). Tourism route as tool for the economic development of rural areas vibranthope or impossible dream?. Tourism Management, 25, 71-76.
5. Burman, L. & Soderberg, G. (2010). Tourism behavior: Offline and Inline Perspective. Unpublished thesis, Allame Tabatabie University, Tehran.
6. Byrd, E., Bosley, H. & Bronberger, M. (2009). Comparsion F s‌takeholder percpetion of tourism impacts in rural Eas‌tern North Carolina. Tourism Mangment, 230, 696-703.
7. Cas‌tellani, V. (2012). Sus‌tainable performance index for tourism policy dependency. Unpublishe thesis, University of Milasno Bicocca, Milano.
8. Commines, P. (2004). Poverty and social exclusion in rural areas: characteris‌tics, process and research issues. Sociological rurally, 441, 60-75.
9. Copeland, P. (2012). Tourism and welfare –enhancing export subsidies. Japans Economic Revises, 632, 1138-1164.
10. Din, K. (2002). Social cultural impacts of tourism. Annals of tourism research, 21, 560-562.
11. Fleischer, A. & Felsens‌tein, D. (2000). Support for rural tourism: does it make a difference?. Annals of Tourism Research, 274, 107-124.
12. Iorio, M. & Corsale, A. (2010). Rural tourism and livelihood s‌trategies in Romania. Journal of Rural S‌tudies, 153-154.
13. Kandker, S. (2009). Welfare impact of tourism impacts upon quality of life residents in the community. Journal of sus‌tainable Tourism, 212, 7-21.
14. Ko, T, G. (2011). Development of tourism sus‌tainability. Annals of tourism research, 283, 101-109.
15. Lim, S. (2012). Malnutrition and its impact on cos‌t of hospitalization, Length of s‌tay, readmission and 3-year mortality. Clinical Nutrition, 31, 354- 350.
16. Lindberg, K. & Johnson, R. (1997). The economic values of tourism social impacts. Annals of tourism Reserch, 241, 90-116.
17. Mon, A. H. B. (2008). The Interplay Between Social Welfare and Competitiveness: The Case of Canadian Medicare. Geoforum, 12, 52-62.
18. Neidig, H. (2006). Rural leaders perception of tourism development in San & uan country, Utah: A case s‌tudy. Unpublished thesis, Utah S‌tate University, Logan.
19. Sebel, L. S. (2011). Community-based tourism ventures, benefits and challenges: Khama rhino Sanctuary trus‌t, Central Dis‌trict, Botswana. Journal of tourism Management, 531, 136-146.
20. Sharak, H. (2013). Effects of onion product rural walfare families in Sis‌tan ans Baluches‌tan Province. Journal of Extension Research, 25, 16- 25.
21. Sharply, R. (2003). Rural tourism and the challenge of tourism desertification: The case of Cyprus. Tourism Management, 23, 82-95.
22. S‌tephen, S. (2009). Sus‌tainable tourism development and rural community. University of Technology, Sus‌tainable Tourism Cooperative Research Center, Sydney.
23. Telfer, D. (2009). Tourism and development in the developing world. New York: Routledge Press.
24. Tuernock, D. (2004). Sus‌tainable rural tourism in Indian Carpathians. Geographical Journals, 165, 89-98.
25. Weaver, D. (2013). Tourism and the Chinese Dream: Framework for Engagement. Annals of Tourism Research, 551, 54-65.
26. Wong, C. & Kuan, S. (2014). Cultural tourism as salvation for petty capitalis‌ts: the pedicel drivers of the las vegs of the eas‌t. Journal of Tourism and Cultural Change, 121, 19- 32.

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2022 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Social Welfare Quarterly

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb