Social Welfare
رفاه اجتماعی
refahj
http://refahj.uswr.ac.ir
18
agent2
1735-8191
10.29252/refahj
fa
jalali
1388
7
1
gregorian
2009
10
1
9
34
online
1
fulltext
fa
ارزیابی گستره مداخله قانونگذار کیفری ایران در حوزه آسیبها و انحرافات اجتماعی
Range of Legislative Intervention in The field of Social Problems and deviations
رفاه اجتماعی
اصیل
orginal
<p dir="RTL" style="margin-right:1.0cm;"><strong><em>طرح مسئله</em></strong><em>: حقوق کیفری، یکی از سازوکارهای</em> <em>مهم کنترل اجتماعی است که هدف آن تنظیم رفتار و فعالیتهای افراد در جامعه از رهگذر پاسخهای سرکوبگر است. این مداخله به منظور اهداف خاصی تجویز میشود که بیتوجهی به محدودیتها و ظرفیتهای عملی این نوع مداخله، درجه موفقیت آن را با تردیدهای جدی مواجه میکند. مقاله حاضر به بررسی این موضوع در قلمرو جرایم راجع به انحرافات و آسیبهای اجتماعی میپردازد. </em></p>
<p dir="RTL" style="margin-right:1.0cm;"><strong><em>روش تحقیق</em></strong><em>: این پژوهش به روش توصیفی و تحلیلی صورت گرفته است و در آن از طریق بررسی سیاست کیفری تقنینی ایران به ارزیابی مداخله کیفری در پرتو مطالعات و تحقیقات تطبیقی و میدانی میپردازد. </em></p>
<p dir="RTL" style="margin-right:1.0cm;"><strong><em>یافتهها</em></strong><em>: قانونگذار ایرانی به منظور مبارزه با رفتارهای نامطلوب و ناهنجار به نحو گستردهای از سازوکار جرم انگاری رفتارهایی که غالبا در چارچوب انحرافها، گناهان و اعمال حرام قرار میگیرند، بهره جسته است. اصول و مبانی عملی و نظری جرمانگاری و نیل به اهداف بازدارنده حقوق کیفری، ایجاب میکنند که مداخلات غیرکیفری و اجتماعی وحتی درمانی و پزشکی در این قلمروها در اولویت قرار گیرند. </em></p>
<p dir="RTL" style="margin-right:1.0cm;"><strong><em>نتایج</em></strong><em>: جرمانگاری حداکثری در حوزه انحرافات و آسیبهای اجتماعی آثار و تبعات منفی زیادی به دنبال دارد. در این زمینه میتوان به گسترش فرایند برچسب زنی، کاهش ابهت دستگاه عدالت کیفری، نقض حریم خصوصی شهروندان، و تورم جمعیت کیفری زندانها اشاره کرد.</em></p>
<p style="margin-left:.35pt;"><strong>Objectives: </strong>Criminal law is one of the important social control mechanisms that regulate behavior and people activities in society. This kind of interference there is a difference with other instruments social control because of using repressive techniques against those who infraction its instructions. Penal law defines values that represents our way of life are reflected and use the direction of "big stick" punishment as a tool in direction of strengthening the values and ensure respect for them. In this direction penal law not only sought to protect the individual, but to support the structure and the combination of society as well. Penal interference prescribed in order to achieve the certain objectives is that the negligence to practical and capacity of this kind of interference, confront with serious doubts the rate of its success. This article deals with this issue in the field of crimes related to deviations and social problems.</p>
<p style="margin-left:.35pt;"><strong>Method: </strong>This research is to description and analysis method has been writing and in the light of studying Iran legislative criminal policy assesses the amount of penal interference in the light of experimental and comparative studies.</p>
<p style="margin-left:.15pt;"><strong>Findings: </strong>Iranian legislator to combat undesirable and abnonormal behaviors that is locating in the framework of individual and social Freedom, deviations, sins, and even prohibited behaviors have been use the criminalization mechanism. criminalization's extensive, unjustifiable, vague and general in various areas like the auditory and visual, conduct coverage and titles such as; addiction, vagrancy, Begging, the demonstrators were forbidden to act and committing any practical public chastity wound labarum are unqualified recognition, not only has provided to securing the expression of some deviations in the form of crime and Commixture borders between crime and sin, But also with instrumental using of criminal law for apparent social Coordinate and lack of success in general and specific intimidation citizens about the preventing of committing of criminalizing behaviors due to inattention to values of people and public opinion have been reduced the dignity of the criminal justice.</p>
<p style="margin-left:.5pt;"><strong>Results: </strong>criminal justice system has limited capacity in fighting against crime and the giving of responsibility of social control for it. Criminalization should be considered as the ultima ratio and with the observation of theoretical, practical and criminological limitations about the criminalization. Inattention to the subject of many negative consequences and will be followed. Most important of which can be name the increase number of black and gray crime, representing negative social criminal justice system, creating realms discriminative and possibility the abuse in the implementation of the law, weakening moral dimensions of Criminal Law, a decrease in efficiency of punishments, potential criminologinic of criminal law by labeling process and legitimacy crisis. In line with the problem proposed the assigning criminal reactions by some of the favorableness offensive behavior and handing over the current; organizing and controlling behaviors in other fields such as educational system, the family, the cultural and religious institutions, medical , health and welfare Structures.</p>
انحراف, آسیب اجتماعی, بازدارندگی, جرم انگاری, گناه
Crime, Criminalization, Deterrence, deviation, sin ,Social Problems
301
320
http://refahj.uswr.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-817-289&slc_lang=fa&sid=1
Amirhamze
Zeinali
امیر حمزه
زینالی
180031947532846007910
180031947532846007910
Yes