fa بررسی اثر موقعیت بازی در فضای کنش بر رفتار در دوراهی‌اجتماعی‌: آزمون مدل چلبی ‌ رفاه اجتماعی اصیل orginal <p>طرح مسأله: این ‌مقاله ‌به ‌بررسی ‌تاثیر فضای‌ کنش ‌بر رفتار افراد در دوراهی ‌اجتماعی ‌می‌پردازد. دوراهی ‌اجتماعی‌، در چارچوب‌ نظریه ‌انتخاب ‌عاقلانه‌، به ‌تعارض ‌منافع ‌فردی ‌و جمعی‌ ارجاع ‌دارد، آن‌گاه ‌که ‌تعقیب ‌نفع ‌فردی ‌از سوی ‌کثیری ‌از افراد، به ‌زیان ‌همه ‌افراد (و از جمله‌خود آن ‌افراد) منجر می‌شود. در میان ‌عوامل ‌موثر بر رفتار در دوراهی ‌اجتماعی‌، مدل ‌فضای‌ کنش (ارائه شده ‌توسط‌ مسعود چلبی‌)‌، به ‌تاثیر هنجارها و روابط‌ حاکم ‌در مناطق ‌حدی‌ چهارگانه ‌بر رفتار در دوراهی ‌اجتماعی‌ می‌پردازد. روش: یافته‌های این تحقیق با استفاده از پرسش‌نامه محقق ساخته، و با روش پیمایش در میان 730 نفر از ساکنان شهر تهران به‌دست آمده است و نتایج تحقیق نیز با استفاده از رگرسیون لوجستیک به‌دست آمده است. یافته‌ها و نتایج: نتایج تحقیق، نشان ‌از تایید تاثیر مدل‌ چلبی ‌و نیز برتری‌ آن ‌بر مدل‌های‌ ارائه شده دیگر ‌دارد، به‌گونه‌ای که برای بررسی رفتارها در دوراهی اجتماعی، می‌توان روابط، هنجارها و موقعیت‌های کنش را از تعیین‌کننده‌ترین عوامل توضیح‌دهنده رفتار دانست. در این‌ مقاله‌، بر پایه مدل‌ چلبی‌، انواع ‌گوناگون ‌بازی‌ها هم‌ به‌صورت‌ تکمیلی‌ آورده ‌شده ‌است‌.</p> <p>Objective: This article investigates the affect of Action Space Model on behavior in social dilemma situations. Social dilemma, in rational choice approach, refer to conflict between social interest and collective interest, in witch following self interest from most of the people lead to losses of all the people (among whom select self interest). Many factors affect on behavior in social dilemma situation, and one of them is Action Space Model (proposed by Masoued Chalabi), that is surveys the affect of norms and relations governing in Parsonsian four extreme points (AGLI) on behavior in social dilemma situations. Chalabi (in continuation of some thinker such as Burns) critics the mainstream of Game Theory and says it is metahistorical and metasocial, and doesn&#39t contemplate social context and background of game, and players cultural framework, norms and morals. They try to expand classic game theory under the new title of Social Game Theory and speak of various game theories, proportionate to different social relations and different social context (action space). Parsonsian action space has four main subsystem (AGIL scheme) and basic hypothesis of this theory is that position of each specific phenomenon in action space, in each level, approximately determinate behavior of that phenomenon. Prisoner&#39s dilemma game agrees with A. In G, an authority or status relationship leads to common assumption of preference and judgment, so that asymmetric outcome of game is a kind of social equilibrium. In I, outcome of game is a cooperative equilibrium, and certainly optimum equilibrium. There isn&#39t any possibility to prisoner&#39s dilemma game, in L. For completing Chalabi model, the author tries to test some other games, in additional to prisoner&#39s dilemma game. In A, the dominant game is prisoner&#39s dilemma game. In G, superior player games on the basis of prisoner&#39s dilemma game and inferior player plays on the basis of chicken game. In I, there is trust game or coordinate game, and finally, in L, if there is any possibility for dominant game, it is same to I. Method: In this article, we use survey on 730 respondents to our questionnaire in Tehran, and result tested by Logistic Regression. Reliability of questionnaire with Cronbach Alpha is equal to 0.7905. Findings & Results:In this article, the result proved Chalabi model and it&#39s dominant on other presenting models, so we can explain behavior in the social dilemma by relationship, norms and situation of action. In all 5 Parsonsian area (with accounting two kind for G: superior and inferior), there is 1 to 3 percent improvement in explanation (power of forecasting) in general model (with all 34 factors that affect on behavior in social dilemma) in compression with Chalabi model (with only 3 factors). But, the preference of Chalabi model is its lower amount of factors. Therefore, Chalabi model is a suitable model to examination of actor&#39s behavior in extreme area in social dilemma situations. Furthermore, the result shows that trust game and coordination game isn&#39t appropriate games to explain behavior in I and L area and we must try to find another of games for these two areas.</p> بازی‌ اجتماعی‌, بازی‌ دوراهی ‌زندانی, دوراهی‌ اجتماعی‌, فضای‌ کنش‌, مدل ‌چلبی‌ Chalabi Model, Prisoner\'s Dilemma Game, Social Dilemma, Social Game, Space of Action 269 300 http://refahj.uswr.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-1-282&slc_lang=fa&sid=1 Mohamad reza Javadi yegane محمدرضا جوادی‌یگانه Yes